Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,077 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Elaine Kurtenbach results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Negativity Bias , and Availability Heuristic , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 39.8% saturation with 1,287 hits . Analysis detected 7,188 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,231 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.9% and a BS Rank of 93% (525 of 6,628 authors). This Elaine Kurtenbach is worse (more manipulative) than 92.10% of the peer group. Elaine Kurtenbach
Author details
Total words: 3,231
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
92% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 92.1% percentile 7.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 22.2% 22.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 28.6% 28.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 21.2% 21.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 23.3% 23.3% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 39.8% 39.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 27.6% 27.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.1% 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 9.3% 9.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 39.8%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 28.6%, sitewide 11.1% Negativity Bias: Author 27.6%, sitewide 19.2% Availability Heuristic: Author 23.3%, sitewide 9.1% Pessimism Bias: Author 22.2%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Author 21.2%, sitewide 4.0% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 15.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 9.3%, sitewide 3.3% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.9% Recency Bias: Author 6.6%, sitewide 2.7% Optimism Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 5.7%, sitewide 4.6% Slippery Slope: Author 5.6%, sitewide 1.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 4.1%, sitewide 1.1% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.5% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.4% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst