Gas prices eclipse $4 a gallon in the U.S., the highest since 2022 64%

By Wyatte Grantham-Philips80% Angela Charlton0% Bill Barrow42%

3/31/2026, 11:20:39 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 31 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Availability Heuristic, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 26% saturation with 244 hits. Analysis detected 1,776 faulty-reasoning hits from 939 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 58.3% and a BS Rank of 64% (8,016 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 63.40% of the article peer group.

NEW YORK  U.S. gas prices jumped past an average of $4 a gallon for the first time since 2022 on Tuesday as the Iran war pushed fuel prices to soar worldwide. 
According to motor club AAA, the national average for a gallon of regular gasoline is now $4.02  over a dollar more than before the war began. 
The last time U.S. drivers were collectively paying this much at the pump was nearly four years ago, following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. 
The price is a national average, meaning drivers in some states have been paying well over $4 a gallon for a while now. 
Prices vary from state to state due to factors ranging from nearby supply to differing tax rates. 
Since the U.S. and Israel launched a joint war against Iran on Feb. 28, the cost of crude oil  the main ingredient in gasoline  has spiked and swung rapidly. 
That’s because the conflict has caused deep supply chain disruptions and cuts from major oil producers across the Middle East. 
Motorists around the world are also coping with higher gas prices due to the war. 
In Paris, for example, gas is at 2.34 euros per liter ($2.68), which is about $10.27 a gallon. 
Expensive gas could drag on the economy and drive up other prices 
Higher gas prices are impacting consumers and businesses as many households continue to face wider cost of living strains. 
And as drivers pay more to cover necessities like gas, many may be forced to cut their budgets in other places. 
More expensive fuel can also push up other spending, from utility bills to the price of many goods consumers buy each day. 
Consumer prices and the cost of living already have become flashpoints in this midterm election year, with Democrats especially hammering Trump and Republicans as the GOP tries to hold majorities on Capitol Hill. 
A recent AP-NORC poll found that 45% of U.S. adults are “extremely” or “very” concerned about being able to afford gas in the next few months, up from 30% shortly after Trump won the 2024 presidential election with promises to lower costs. 
In the immediate future, analysts point to groceries, which have to be restocked frequently and could also see price hikes as businesses’ transportation costs pile up. 
But hauling other cargo and packages has also been impacted. 
The United Postal Service, for example, is seeking a temporary 8% added charge on some of its popular products including Priority Mail. 
U.S. diesel prices  the fuel used for many freight and delivery trucks  is now going for an average of $5.45 a gallon, up from about $3.76 a gallon before the war began, per AAA. 
If the war drags on, it’s possible that those prices could tick up even higher. 
Most tanker movement in the key Strait of Hormuz, where roughly one-fifth of the world’s oil typically sails through, remains at a halt. 
That’s led to cuts from major producers in the region who have no way of getting their crude to market. 
Meanwhile, Iran, Israel and the U.S. have all struck oil and gas facilities, worsening supply concerns. 
Reserves open in an effort to cut prices 
In a search for some relief, the International Energy Agency pledged to release 400 million barrels of oil from emergency stockpiles of member nations. 
That includes the U.S., despite Trump initially downplaying the need for reserve oil. 
The Trump administration has also eased sanctions to free up some oil from Venezuela, and temporarily Russia. 
The White House also says it’s waiving maritime shipping requirements under a more than century-old law, known as the Jones Act, for 60 days. 
It’s not yet clear if those efforts will bring relief for consumers. 
A lot of factors contribute to gas prices. 
Refineries buy crude oil in advance, meaning some could be work with more expensive oil for a while, and it will take time for any new supply to trickle down to consumers. 
And while steep crude prices are a leading driver behind today’s surge, U.S. gas prices typically tick up a bit at this time of year. 
More drivers are hitting the road and trying to fuel up while they can, so there’s higher demand. 
Warming weather also brings a shift to summer blend fuel, which is more expensive to produce than winter blend. 
The U.S. is an oil exporter, but it’s still affected by global prices 
The U.S., which is a net oil exporter, hasn’t seen as stark a shock as other parts of the world that rely more heavily on fuel imports from the Middle East, notably Asia. 
But that doesn’t mean America is immune to price spikes. 
Oil is a globally-traded commodity. 
And most of what the U.S. produces is light, sweet crude  but refineries on the East and West coasts are primarily designed to process heavier, sour product. 
As a result, the country also needs imports. 
Escalating geopolitical conflicts have disrupted oil flows and contributed to a surge in gas prices in the past. 
The U.S. average for regular gasoline climbed to its highest level of more than $5 a gallon in June 2022, nearly four months after the Ukraine war began and world leaders imposed sanctions against Russia, a leading oil producer. 
Prices at the pump later fell from that record. 
Before Tuesday, per AAA data, the national average had stayed below the $4 mark since mid-August of 2022. 
Grantham-Philips writes for the Associated Press. 
Associated Press journalists Angela Charlton in Paris and Bill Barrow in Washington contributed to this report. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 5.9%Wyatte Grantham-Philips: 2.9%Daily Pilot: 2.9%Confirmation Bias5.9%This article: 9.4%Wyatte Grantham-Philips: 5.8%Daily Pilot: 1.2%Anchoring Bias9.4%This article: 10.8%Wyatte Grantham-Philips: 8.8%Daily Pilot: 3.5%Availability Heuristic10.8%This article: 4.3%Wyatte Grantham-Philips: 0.9%Daily Pilot: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic4.3%This article: 4.4%Wyatte Grantham-Philips: 0.7%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Hindsight Bias4.4%This article: 10.3%Wyatte Grantham-Philips: 3.3%Daily Pilot: 1.9%Overconfidence Bias10.3%This article: 8.5%Wyatte Grantham-Philips: 14.6%Daily Pilot: 7.5%Framing Effect8.5%This article: 2.2%Wyatte Grantham-Philips: 1.1%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Loss Aversion2.2%This article: 2.4%Wyatte Grantham-Philips: 1.5%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Status Quo Bias2.4%This article: 0.0%Wyatte Grantham-Philips: 0.1%Daily Pilot: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 3.4%Wyatte Grantham-Philips: 3.7%Daily Pilot: 3.6%Optimism Bias3.4%This article: 8.5%Wyatte Grantham-Philips: 5.9%Daily Pilot: 1.4%Pessimism Bias8.5%This article: 17.4%Wyatte Grantham-Philips: 11.1%Daily Pilot: 7.8%Negativity Bias17.4%This article: 0.0%Wyatte Grantham-Philips: 3.6%Daily Pilot: 2.2%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 1.7%Wyatte Grantham-Philips: 0.8%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error1.7%This article: 0.0%Wyatte Grantham-Philips: 0.2%Daily Pilot: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 3.5%Wyatte Grantham-Philips: 2.0%Daily Pilot: 1.6%In-Group Bias3.5%This article: 3.5%Wyatte Grantham-Philips: 0.4%Daily Pilot: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias3.5%This article: 0.0%Wyatte Grantham-Philips: 1.2%Daily Pilot: 5.1%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Wyatte Grantham-Philips: 0.1%Daily Pilot: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Wyatte Grantham-Philips: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 2.4%Wyatte Grantham-Philips: 3.4%Daily Pilot: 1.3%Recency Bias2.4%This article: 0.0%Wyatte Grantham-Philips: 0.1%Daily Pilot: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.9%Wyatte Grantham-Philips: 0.1%Daily Pilot: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.9%This article: 1.4%Wyatte Grantham-Philips: 1.3%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Ad Hominem1.4%This article: 0.0%Wyatte Grantham-Philips: 0.3%Daily Pilot: 0.3%Straw Man0.0%This article: 16.5%Wyatte Grantham-Philips: 7.4%Daily Pilot: 4.9%Appeal to Authority16.5%This article: 2.4%Wyatte Grantham-Philips: 0.8%Daily Pilot: 1.2%False Dilemma2.4%This article: 2.9%Wyatte Grantham-Philips: 3.5%Daily Pilot: 0.7%Slippery Slope2.9%This article: 0.0%Wyatte Grantham-Philips: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 4.2%Wyatte Grantham-Philips: 2.7%Daily Pilot: 4.4%Hasty Generalization4.2%This article: 0.0%Wyatte Grantham-Philips: 0.4%Daily Pilot: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 3.5%Wyatte Grantham-Philips: 1.3%Daily Pilot: 1.0%Bandwagon3.5%This article: 0.0%Wyatte Grantham-Philips: 5.7%Daily Pilot: 5.7%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 2.1%Wyatte Grantham-Philips: 1.5%Daily Pilot: 0.7%Begging the Question2.1%This article: 26.0%Wyatte Grantham-Philips: 6.9%Daily Pilot: 2.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)26.0%This article: 0.0%Wyatte Grantham-Philips: 0.6%Daily Pilot: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Wyatte Grantham-Philips: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Wyatte Grantham-Philips: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 3.0%Wyatte Grantham-Philips: 0.3%Daily Pilot: 0.3%Composition/Division3.0%This article: 4.3%Wyatte Grantham-Philips: 1.5%Daily Pilot: 2.8%Anecdotal4.3%This article: 0.0%Wyatte Grantham-Philips: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 8.7%Wyatte Grantham-Philips: 1.7%Daily Pilot: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)8.7%This article: 0.0%Wyatte Grantham-Philips: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Wyatte Grantham-Philips: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Wyatte Grantham-Philips: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Wyatte Grantham-Philips: 0.2%Daily Pilot: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Wyatte Grantham-Philips: 1.7%Daily Pilot: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 2.8%Wyatte Grantham-Philips: 0.9%Daily Pilot: 1.3%Unattributed Quote2.8%This article: 0.0%Wyatte Grantham-Philips: 0.5%Daily Pilot: 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 7.0%Wyatte Grantham-Philips: 2.8%Daily Pilot: 6.0%Biased Writer Voice7.0%This article: 0.0%Wyatte Grantham-Philips: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 1.5%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 4.9%Wyatte Grantham-Philips: 1.8%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias4.9%This article: 0.0%Wyatte Grantham-Philips: 0.4%Daily Pilot: 0.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Wyatte Grantham-Philips: 0.1%Daily Pilot: 4.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

939 words analyzed.

Speakers

7speakers24%attributed speech713writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 100.0% coverageAAA • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 100.0% coverageAP-NORC • 42 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageUnited Postal Service • 22 words • 0.0% coverageAAA • 36 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageInternational Energy Agency • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageTrump administration • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWhite House • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 39 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageAAA • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageAssociated Press • 16 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

AP-NORC

100%flagged-word coverage
42 attributed words19% of attributed speech89% writer coverage
0%5.0%10.0%Biased Writer Voice-9.3 ptsWriter: 9.3%AP-NORC: 0.0%0.0%Politically Left Leaning B-6.5 ptsWriter: 6.5%AP-NORC: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-3.6 ptsWriter: 3.6%AP-NORC: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.