Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video939 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Consumer Impact results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 12.6% saturation with 472 hits. Analysis detected 3,019 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,756 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠42% (9,653 of 16,562 topics). This Consumer Impact is better (less manipulative) than 58.30% of the peer group.
Consumer Impact
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,756
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

42% percentile
025507510041.7% percentile
2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.7%8.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.1%7.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 12.6%12.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.1%4.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.5%1.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.9%0.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.2%5.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 19.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 12.6%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 4.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 4.6%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 2.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.8%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos