Speaker summary
⁠46%3 analyzed articles/videos33.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These AP-NORC results contain 1 faulty reasoning type, including Framing Effect, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 31 hits. Analysis detected 31 faulty-reasoning hits from 33.667 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠99% (283 of 27,377 speakers). This AP-NORC is worse (more manipulative) than 99.00% of the peer group.
AP-NORC
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 33.667
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

99% percentile
025507510099.0% percentile
100.0% BS Score3 analyzed videos33.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Framing Effect: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 26.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos