Publication summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These dailygazette.com results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Authority , and Confirmation Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.1% saturation with 670 hits . Analysis detected 5,963 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,472 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 398 publications). This dailygazette.com is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 9,472
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score3 analyzed articles9.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 6.0% 6.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 2.4% 2.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 7.1% 7.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 2.1% 2.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 5.5% 5.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 1.2% 1.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 1.9% 1.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 3.4% 3.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Publication 1.5% 1.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Publication 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 6.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 7.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 2.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 5.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 3.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 4.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 1.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 2.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Loss Aversion: Publication 2.9%, sitewide 2.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst