Topic summary
71% 141 analyzed articles/videos 78,736 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Economy results contain 55 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11% saturation with 40,008 hits . Analysis detected 374,292 faulty-reasoning hits from 364,337 analyzed words across 141 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 19% (12,841 of 15,785 topics). This Economy is better (less manipulative) than 81.30% of the peer group. Economy
Topic details
Total words: 364,337
Article count: 141
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
19% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 18.7% percentile 1.9% BS Score141 analyzed articles364.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 11.0% 11.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.1% 5.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 10.1% 10.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.5% 5.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.8% 3.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.8% 3.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.0%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.0% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst