Millions have signed up for Trump Accounts, but some families are still waiting for baby's $1,000 52%

By MORIAH BALINGIT42%

7/22/2026, 10:18:29 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 28 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Appeal to Authority, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 22.4% saturation with 190 hits. Analysis detected 1,535 faulty-reasoning hits from 847 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 51.1% and a BS Rank of 52% (10,622 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 51.50% of the article peer group.

Millions have signed up for Trump Accounts, but some families are still waiting for baby's $1,000 
WASHINGTON (AP)  At a rally Wednesday, President Donald Trump touted the $1,000 babies can receive when their parents open Trump Accounts in their names, seed money that Trump says will help give them “a really fair shot at the American dream.” 
“Think of that. 
The government is finally giving money back to our children,” Trump said to the crowd gathered at a Georgia high school 
Some parents who opened accounts earlier this month for their babies say they're still waiting for their $1,000. 
The accounts went live July 4, two days before Trump rang the opening bells for the New York Stock Exchange and the Nasdaq from the Oval Office. 
For babies born since Trump took office last year, $1,000 from the U.S. 
Treasury is supposed to kick off the accounts. 
While some parents report receiving the money, others said in interviews and on social media they're still waiting for their $1,000. 
Masaki and Kristina McLellan, new parents from Bergen County, New Jersey, said in an interview they were wary of signing up for the accounts because they worried it was a promotional stunt for the president. 
But the $1,000 incentive persuaded the couple, whose daughter Maya was born in late March, to start an account anyway. 
Masaki McLellan said he applied for the account July 6. 
At first, the application was rejected, but the account was activated after he called the Trump Account hotline. 
He was told he'd see the money in the account in 10 days. 
Now, he says, he's been told it will take up to four weeks. 
Kristina McLellan said she was disappointed it was taking so long to fund her daughter's account. 
But the infant has multiple other investments already compounding for her. 
Maya's parents have already started a 529 college savings plan and a custodial brokerage account for her. 
The Trump Account is the third investment account in the little girl's name. 
“We definitely want to give her options for her future and make sure she can choose what she wants to do,” said McLellan, a studio director for a local news station, who returns from maternity leave next week. 
The Treasury Department emphasized the McLellans’ case is unusual and said only a sliver of those who apply need customer support. 
Treasury says most parents wait only 1 or 2 days 
The Treasury Department said that the lag between opening an account and receiving the seed funding constitutes “standard processing time, like receiving a tax refund,” and that the overwhelming majority of parents are waiting only one to two days. 
But the department likes to give parents a conservative estimate for how long it might take for the money to be transferred, such as the estimate of up to four weeks given to the McLellans. 
“Trump Accounts level the playing field by allowing every parent to invest in their children’s future, not just wealthy families with trust funds,” the department said. 
The government also unveiled an initiative last month that permits child welfare agencies to open accounts on behalf of foster youth. 
"With roughly 1 million sign-ups per month before launch, Trump Accounts have become the most popular and successful government-backed savings product in U.S. history,” the Treasury Department said. 
On Wednesday, Trump called the accounts “the most consequential” part of his signature tax and spending cuts bill, also known as the One Big Beautiful Bill. 
Trump faces pressure over his handling of the economy 
Trump's stop in Georgia comes as he and fellow Republicans face pressure in the midterm elections for their handling of the economy. 
Only 33% of U.S. adults approve of Trump’s economic leadership, among the lower ratings of his second term, according to a June survey by The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research. 
Trump pledged to lower costs, but his tariffs and the war in Iran have instead helped to increase prices. 
Trump Accounts are similar to baby bonds, championed by Democratic-led cities and states meant to shrink the wealth gap between low- and high-income children. 
But unlike most baby bonds, which generally target kids from disadvantaged backgrounds, Trump Accounts are available to families of all incomes. 
The program has faced criticism from those who say it does nothing to help families in a child's first years of life, when children are most likely to experience poverty, homelessness and hunger. 
And the Republican bill that created the program also slashed funding for programs that are disproportionately used by children, including Medicaid and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program. 
This story has been corrected to show the mother's surname is McLellan, not McClellan. 
Associated Press writers Seung Min Kim and Adriana Morga contributed to this report. 
The Associated Press’ education coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. 
The AP is solely responsible for all content. 
Find the AP’s standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at AP.org. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 11.0%MORIAH BALINGIT: 1.9%Union-Bulletin: 2.1%Confirmation Bias11.0%This article: 1.5%MORIAH BALINGIT: 2.4%Union-Bulletin: 2.5%Anchoring Bias1.5%This article: 5.8%MORIAH BALINGIT: 1.4%Union-Bulletin: 1.8%Availability Heuristic5.8%This article: 2.8%MORIAH BALINGIT: 0.2%Union-Bulletin: 0.5%Representativeness Heuristic2.8%This article: 0.0%MORIAH BALINGIT: 0.0%Union-Bulletin: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 4.1%MORIAH BALINGIT: 3.5%Union-Bulletin: 4.0%Overconfidence Bias4.1%This article: 11.1%MORIAH BALINGIT: 9.1%Union-Bulletin: 13.0%Framing Effect11.1%This article: 1.9%MORIAH BALINGIT: 0.4%Union-Bulletin: 0.3%Loss Aversion1.9%This article: 4.5%MORIAH BALINGIT: 0.8%Union-Bulletin: 1.3%Status Quo Bias4.5%This article: 0.0%MORIAH BALINGIT: 0.0%Union-Bulletin: 0.0%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 8.3%MORIAH BALINGIT: 2.9%Union-Bulletin: 2.7%Optimism Bias8.3%This article: 4.1%MORIAH BALINGIT: 1.2%Union-Bulletin: 0.7%Pessimism Bias4.1%This article: 22.4%MORIAH BALINGIT: 8.3%Union-Bulletin: 12.8%Negativity Bias22.4%This article: 5.5%MORIAH BALINGIT: 1.6%Union-Bulletin: 5.9%Self-Serving Bias5.5%This article: 0.0%MORIAH BALINGIT: 0.0%Union-Bulletin: 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%MORIAH BALINGIT: 0.0%Union-Bulletin: 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%MORIAH BALINGIT: 1.4%Union-Bulletin: 0.0%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%MORIAH BALINGIT: 0.0%Union-Bulletin: 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 5.5%MORIAH BALINGIT: 1.5%Union-Bulletin: 1.4%Halo Effect5.5%This article: 0.0%MORIAH BALINGIT: 0.0%Union-Bulletin: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%MORIAH BALINGIT: 0.0%Union-Bulletin: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 1.1%MORIAH BALINGIT: 0.9%Union-Bulletin: 1.9%Recency Bias1.1%This article: 0.0%MORIAH BALINGIT: 0.0%Union-Bulletin: 0.0%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 1.4%MORIAH BALINGIT: 0.1%Union-Bulletin: 0.2%Blind-Spot Bias1.4%This article: 0.0%MORIAH BALINGIT: 0.0%Union-Bulletin: 2.3%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%MORIAH BALINGIT: 1.1%Union-Bulletin: 0.0%Straw Man0.0%This article: 16.3%MORIAH BALINGIT: 3.6%Union-Bulletin: 5.3%Appeal to Authority16.3%This article: 0.0%MORIAH BALINGIT: 1.8%Union-Bulletin: 1.7%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%MORIAH BALINGIT: 0.0%Union-Bulletin: 0.0%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%MORIAH BALINGIT: 0.0%Union-Bulletin: 0.0%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 9.7%MORIAH BALINGIT: 2.9%Union-Bulletin: 4.7%Hasty Generalization9.7%This article: 0.0%MORIAH BALINGIT: 0.7%Union-Bulletin: 0.0%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%MORIAH BALINGIT: 0.9%Union-Bulletin: 0.6%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 9.4%MORIAH BALINGIT: 6.1%Union-Bulletin: 4.4%Appeal to Emotion9.4%This article: 5.5%MORIAH BALINGIT: 1.0%Union-Bulletin: 0.9%Begging the Question5.5%This article: 5.4%MORIAH BALINGIT: 1.8%Union-Bulletin: 3.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)5.4%This article: 0.0%MORIAH BALINGIT: 0.0%Union-Bulletin: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 1.3%MORIAH BALINGIT: 0.3%Union-Bulletin: 1.8%Burden of Proof1.3%This article: 0.0%MORIAH BALINGIT: 0.0%Union-Bulletin: 0.0%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%MORIAH BALINGIT: 0.2%Union-Bulletin: 0.0%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 18.5%MORIAH BALINGIT: 2.5%Union-Bulletin: 3.4%Anecdotal18.5%This article: 2.5%MORIAH BALINGIT: 0.2%Union-Bulletin: 0.4%No True Scotsman2.5%This article: 8.7%MORIAH BALINGIT: 0.8%Union-Bulletin: 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)8.7%This article: 0.0%MORIAH BALINGIT: 0.0%Union-Bulletin: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%MORIAH BALINGIT: 0.0%Union-Bulletin: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 2.1%MORIAH BALINGIT: 0.2%Union-Bulletin: 0.4%Personal Incredulity2.1%This article: 4.1%MORIAH BALINGIT: 0.7%Union-Bulletin: 2.0%Special Pleading4.1%This article: 0.0%MORIAH BALINGIT: 0.0%Union-Bulletin: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%MORIAH BALINGIT: 0.4%Union-Bulletin: 1.4%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%MORIAH BALINGIT: 0.0%Union-Bulletin: 1.3%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%MORIAH BALINGIT: 1.1%Union-Bulletin: 1.7%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 3.1%MORIAH BALINGIT: 0.6%Union-Bulletin: 0.5%Indoctrination3.1%This article: 0.0%MORIAH BALINGIT: 0.5%Union-Bulletin: 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%MORIAH BALINGIT: 1.4%Union-Bulletin: 0.8%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 3.3%MORIAH BALINGIT: 0.7%Union-Bulletin: 0.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…3.3%

847 words analyzed.

Speakers

5speakers40%attributed speech505writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 42 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 3 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageMasaki McLellan • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageMasaki McLellan • 10 words • 0.0% coverageMasaki McLellan • 18 words • 0.0% coverageMasaki McLellan • 13 words • 0.0% coverageMasaki McLellan • 13 words • 0.0% coverageKristina McLellan • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageMcLellan • 38 words • 0.0% coverageU.S. Treasury Department • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageU.S. Treasury Department • 39 words • 0.0% coverageU.S. Treasury Department • 35 words • 0.0% coverageU.S. Treasury Department • 26 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageU.S. Treasury Department • 28 words • 100.0% coverageDonald Trump • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverage
100%flagged-word coverage
149 attributed words44% of attributed speech69% writer coverage
0%10.0%20.0%Attempt to Sell a Product +18.8 ptsWriter: 0.0%U.S. Treasury Department: 18.8%18.8%Indoctrination+17.4 ptsWriter: 0.0%U.S. Treasury Department: 17.4%17.4%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.