Topic summary
60% 16 analyzed articles/videos 7,493 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Organized Crime results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.1% saturation with 4,363 hits . Analysis detected 32,643 faulty-reasoning hits from 33,191 analyzed words across 16 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 22% (12,096 of 15,409 topics). This Organized Crime is better (less manipulative) than 78.50% of the peer group. Organized Crime
Topic details
Total words: 33,191
Article count: 16
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
22% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 21.5% percentile 2.0% BS Score16 analyzed articles33.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 8.3% 8.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 8.1% 8.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 13.2% 13.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.3% 5.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.3% 4.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 13.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.6%, sitewide 3.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst