Rubio: 2 Brazilian gangs now designated as terrorist organizations 83%

By Jenna Lee0%

5/29/2026, 6:54:10 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 23 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Recency Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 19.4% saturation with 77 hits. Analysis detected 941 faulty-reasoning hits from 396 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 74.6% and a BS Rank of 83% (3,704 of 21,172 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 82.50% of the article peer group.

U.S. 
Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced that the U.S. will designate Brazil’s two largest criminal gangs as Foreign Terrorist Organizations (FTOs)  a move expected to open the door for more aggressive interventions following appeals from the political opposition in Brazil. 
Effective June 5th, the First Command of the Capital (PCC) and the Red Command (CV), will officially be considered FTOs as the Trump administration intensifies its pressure on crime cartels operating across Latin America. 
“CV and PCC are two of the most violent criminal organizations in Brazil,” Rubio said in a statement. 
“Together, they command thousands of members and have orchestrated brutal attacks against Brazilian police officers, public officials, and civilians. 
Their influence and illicit networks extend far beyond Brazil’s borders, across our region and into our country. 
Today’s action taken by the State Department further demonstrates the Trump Administration’s unwavering commitment to dismantling cartels and criminal organizations in our region and ensuring the safety of the American people.” 
The decision comes just 24 hours after a Washington visit by Brazilian Senator Flavio Bolsonaro, a presidential hopeful who is preparing a run with the blessing of his father, former President Jair Bolsonaro. 
The senator stated publicly that he personally asked the U.S. government to designate the groups as terrorists. 
Aides to the senator, who also met with Rubio, raised the issue to elevate voter concerns surrounding violent crime ahead of Brazil’s October presidential election, while simultaneously aligning their platform with the Trump administration. 
Experts say that the PCC and CV likely command over 50,000 members combined. 
The majority of the PCC’s operations are centered in the metropolis of Sao Paulo, while the CV remains heavily based in Rio de Janeiro. 
The administration of current left-wing Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva had consistently made efforts to avoid such designations. 
Silva had reportedly refrained from doing so out of fear they could pave the way for unilateral U.S. military action or crippling sanctions against domestic banks that unknowingly process transactions involving gang members. 
“International cooperation is welcome, especially on topics such as money laundering and arms trafficking. 
Using it as a pretext for intervention is unacceptable,” responded Celso Amorim, Lula’s top foreign policy adviser, urging caution following the U.S. announcement. 
Stay informed! 
Receive breaking news alerts directly to your inbox for free. 
Subscribe here. https://www.oann.com/alerts 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 10.4%Jenna Lee: 2.6%One America News Network: 4.6%Confirmation Bias10.4%This article: 0.0%Jenna Lee: 0.6%One America News Network: 2.4%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 4.3%Jenna Lee: 3.5%One America News Network: 3.9%Availability Heuristic4.3%This article: 0.0%Jenna Lee: 0.7%One America News Network: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Jenna Lee: 0.2%One America News Network: 0.9%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jenna Lee: 0.9%One America News Network: 2.9%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 10.9%Jenna Lee: 8.9%One America News Network: 15.3%Framing Effect10.9%This article: 0.0%Jenna Lee: 0.6%One America News Network: 1.0%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Jenna Lee: 1.4%One America News Network: 1.1%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jenna Lee: 0.1%One America News Network: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 7.8%Jenna Lee: 1.0%One America News Network: 4.3%Optimism Bias7.8%This article: 8.3%Jenna Lee: 1.4%One America News Network: 1.8%Pessimism Bias8.3%This article: 19.4%Jenna Lee: 11.3%One America News Network: 11.8%Negativity Bias19.4%This article: 8.6%Jenna Lee: 1.6%One America News Network: 3.2%Self-Serving Bias8.6%This article: 8.3%Jenna Lee: 0.9%One America News Network: 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error8.3%This article: 8.6%Jenna Lee: 0.4%One America News Network: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias8.6%This article: 0.0%Jenna Lee: 2.3%One America News Network: 3.9%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jenna Lee: 0.3%One America News Network: 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 12.4%Jenna Lee: 1.1%One America News Network: 5.3%Halo Effect12.4%This article: 0.0%Jenna Lee: 0.1%One America News Network: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jenna Lee: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 18.7%Jenna Lee: 1.6%One America News Network: 2.0%Recency Bias18.7%This article: 0.0%Jenna Lee: 0.6%One America News Network: 0.7%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jenna Lee: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jenna Lee: 3.5%One America News Network: 2.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Jenna Lee: 0.1%One America News Network: 0.6%Straw Man0.0%This article: 3.3%Jenna Lee: 3.5%One America News Network: 6.3%Appeal to Authority3.3%This article: 0.0%Jenna Lee: 2.6%One America News Network: 1.8%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 5.8%Jenna Lee: 0.7%One America News Network: 1.1%Slippery Slope5.8%This article: 0.0%Jenna Lee: 0.3%One America News Network: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 5.1%Jenna Lee: 4.0%One America News Network: 5.4%Hasty Generalization5.1%This article: 0.0%Jenna Lee: 0.9%One America News Network: 0.5%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Jenna Lee: 0.5%One America News Network: 1.1%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 12.6%Jenna Lee: 8.5%One America News Network: 10.0%Appeal to Emotion12.6%This article: 8.3%Jenna Lee: 1.3%One America News Network: 1.7%Begging the Question8.3%This article: 18.7%Jenna Lee: 1.9%One America News Network: 3.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)18.7%This article: 0.0%Jenna Lee: 1.5%One America News Network: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 8.6%Jenna Lee: 1.2%One America News Network: 0.6%Burden of Proof8.6%This article: 0.0%Jenna Lee: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Jenna Lee: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Jenna Lee: 0.5%One America News Network: 1.6%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Jenna Lee: 0.1%One America News Network: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 18.9%Jenna Lee: 1.9%One America News Network: 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)18.9%This article: 0.0%Jenna Lee: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Jenna Lee: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Jenna Lee: 0.1%One America News Network: 0.2%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Jenna Lee: 0.1%One America News Network: 0.3%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Jenna Lee: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.7%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 11.6%Jenna Lee: 1.9%One America News Network: 1.7%Unattributed Quote11.6%This article: 4.5%Jenna Lee: 1.9%One America News Network: 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection4.5%This article: 18.7%Jenna Lee: 6.4%One America News Network: 5.2%Biased Writer Voice18.7%This article: 0.0%Jenna Lee: 0.7%One America News Network: 1.1%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Jenna Lee: 0.6%One America News Network: 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jenna Lee: 3.3%One America News Network: 3.8%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 3.8%Jenna Lee: 2.5%One America News Network: 1.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…3.8%

396 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers36%attributed speech254writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 41 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageMarco Rubio • 18 words • 100.0% coverageMarco Rubio • 19 words • 100.0% coverageMarco Rubio • 17 words • 0.0% coverageMarco Rubio • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageFlavio Bolsonaro • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 100.0% coverageCelso Amorim • 14 words • 100.0% coverageCelso Amorim • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageorganization name • 3 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Marco Rubio

100%flagged-word coverage
85 attributed words60% of attributed speech100% writer coverage
0%15.0%30.0%Biased Writer Voice-29.1 ptsWriter: 29.1%Marco Rubio: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote+17.2 ptsWriter: 5.1%Marco Rubio: 22.4%22.4%Quote-first Misdirection+21.2 ptsWriter: 0.0%Marco Rubio: 21.2%21.2%Attempt to Sell a Product -4.7 ptsWriter: 4.7%Marco Rubio: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.