Author summary
85%1 analyzed article/video165 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Panu Wongcha-um results contain 15 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 23.5% saturation with 155 hits. Analysis detected 1,051 faulty-reasoning hits from 660 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 10.6% and a BS Rank of 96% (317 of 6,628 authors). This Panu Wongcha-um is worse (more manipulative) than 95.20% of the peer group.
Panu Wongcha-um
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
96%Panu Wongcha-um (selected)11%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 660
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

95% percentile
025507510095.2% percentile
10.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles660 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.5%1.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 23.5%23.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 11.7%11.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 18.3%18.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 10.2%10.2%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Author 5.2%5.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 13.3%13.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 8.3%8.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 23.3%23.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 8.3%8.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 23.3%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 23.5%, sitewide 11.1%Negativity Bias: Author 17.9%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Author 18.3%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.5%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Author 13.3%, sitewide 9.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 11.7%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 10.2%, sitewide 3.3%Anecdotal: Author 8.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 8.3%, sitewide 4.6%Biased Writer Voice: Author 8.2%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 7.5%Primacy Effect: Author 5.2%, sitewide 0.9%Horn Effect: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos