Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Andrew Bushnell results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 57.9% saturation with 455 hits . Analysis detected 2,736 faulty-reasoning hits from 786 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,628 authors). This Andrew Bushnell is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Andrew Bushnell
Author details
Total words: 786
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles786 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 57.9% 57.9% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 42.6% 42.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 48.1% 48.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 26.8% 26.8% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 16.3% 16.3% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 15.0% 15.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 19.9% 19.9% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 16.5% 16.5% Composition/Division Sitewide 0.2% Author 8.1% 8.1% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Author 8.0% 8.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Biased Writer Voice: Author 57.9%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 48.1%, sitewide 19.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 42.6%, sitewide 3.3% Framing Effect: Author 16.5%, sitewide 26.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 26.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 19.9%, sitewide 7.5% Indoctrination: Author 16.3%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Emotion: Author 13.2%, sitewide 15.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 15.0%, sitewide 1.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 8.0%, sitewide 9.1% Composition/Division: Author 8.1%, sitewide 0.2% Burden of Proof: Author 8.0%, sitewide 0.4% Overconfidence Bias: Author 8.0%, sitewide 4.6% Straw Man: Author 7.4%, sitewide 0.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 5.8%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Author 5.5%, sitewide 1.7% Anecdotal: Author 4.1%, sitewide 5.2% Ad Hominem: Author 5.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Author 3.7%, sitewide 1.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.7%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.7% Circular Reasoning: Author 3.2%, sitewide 0.1% Red Herring: Author 3.2%, sitewide 0.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst