Author summary
70% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,448 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jon Seidel results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 23.6% saturation with 840 hits . Analysis detected 3,866 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,564 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 65% (2,326 of 6,606 authors). This Jon Seidel is worse (more manipulative) than 64.80% of the peer group. Jon Seidel
Author details
Total words: 3,564
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
65% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 64.8% percentile 3.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.3% 1.3% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 19.7% 19.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.2% 0.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.9% 1.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.7% 0.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.8% 6.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 23.6% 23.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.6% 0.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 3.5% 3.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 19.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 23.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 15.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 3.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Bandwagon: Author 3.4%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Genetic Fallacy: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.8% Horn Effect: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.0% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Burden of Proof: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst