Topic summary
79%25 analyzed articles/videos11,198 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nuclear Proliferation results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Overconfidence Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13.9% saturation with 10,731 hits. Analysis detected 79,352 faulty-reasoning hits from 77,124 analyzed words across 25 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 21% (12,424 of 15,689 topics). This Nuclear Proliferation is better (less manipulative) than 79.20% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

21% percentile
025507510020.8% percentile
1.9% BS Score25 analyzed articles77.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 13.9%13.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.8%8.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.5%6.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.4%1.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.7%0.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.2%4.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 5.0%5.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 13.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 4.6%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.1%Slippery Slope: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate