Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video150 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Daniel Bessner results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Authority, and Negativity Bias, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 28% saturation with 168 hits. Analysis detected 437 faulty-reasoning hits from 600 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 10.4% and a BS Rank of 95% (325 of 6,169 authors). This Daniel Bessner is worse (more manipulative) than 94.70% of the peer group.
Daniel Bessner
Author details
Ranking context
Position among analyzed authors
10.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles600 analyzed words
Reasoning profile
Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
Sitewide departure map
Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often