Topic summary
48% 21 analyzed articles/videos 7,988 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Military Action results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Unattributed Quote , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.9% saturation with 5,430 hits . Analysis detected 52,605 faulty-reasoning hits from 54,902 analyzed words across 21 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 20% (12,526 of 15,657 topics). This Military Action is better (less manipulative) than 80.00% of the peer group. Military Action
Topic details
Total words: 54,902
Article count: 21
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
20% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 20.0% percentile 1.9% BS Score21 analyzed articles54.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 9.9% 9.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 8.5% 8.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.8% 5.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.0% 4.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.2% 3.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Topic 6.2% 6.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Unattributed Quote: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 1.1% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 4.6% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst