RedState91%

It's War: Trump Formally Notifies Congress US-Iran Conflict Has Reignited, 60-Day Countdown Starts Now 51%

By Bob Hoge90%

7/13/2026, 8:15:42 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 18 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 16% saturation with 117 hits. Analysis detected 647 faulty-reasoning hits from 733 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 50.8% and a BS Rank of 51% (10,752 of 21,886 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 50.90% of the article peer group.

As the United States military pounds the Islamic Republic of Iran for the third straight night, it’s been revealed that President Trump sent a letter to Congress on Friday notifying lawmakers that the United States is once again officially at war with the mullahs. 
That’s not the same as him asking Congress for a formal declaration of war; it’s an effort to comply with the controversial 1973 War Powers Act. 
The letter, reviewed Monday by multiple news outlets, gives his administration another 60-day clock to battle the Iranians without congressional approval. 
Expect Democrats in Congress to howl, because they maintain that the war really started on February 28 with the opening salvo of Operation Epic Fury, and Trump can’t just unilaterally restart the clock. 
The new set of strikes, which began July 8 but ramped up heavily on Saturday following Iran’s repeated attacks on commercial shipping in the Strait of Hormuz, requires the response, the president wrote. 
The war is a “military action consistent with my responsibility to protect Americans and United States’ interests both at home and abroad.” 
As RedState’s Streiff reported earlier Monday, Trump upped the pressure on Iran by declaring that the Strait is under U.S. control, that container ships are passing through, and that the blockade of Iranian ports is back in business. 
Maybe our new name will be the “Guardian Angel of the Strait,” he quipped. 
He also threatened to seek reimbursement from wealthy countries to pay us back for the security we’ve provided in the crucial waterway now and in previous years. 
…we’re going to be reimbursed because the other nations are very wealthy, they’re on our side… 
You know, we guarded the Strait for 50 years, more, and we never got paid for it… 
And now we’re guarding it and we’re going to get paid for guarding it; a lot of money. 
But we just want to be reimbursed for doing all of this, for putting our people in danger. 
MORE: Plot Twist! 
President Trump Declares Blockade of Iran Is Back on and That the US Controls Hormuz 
'Bunch of Crazy People': US NATO Amb. 
Confirms That Strait of Hormuz Is Open Despite Iran's Defiance 
Trump declared a truce in April after the two countries agreed to negotiate in good faith on a Memorandum of Understanding, which was eventually hashed out. 
The president declared the MOU null and void on July 8, however, after the IRGC kept attacking commercial ships. 
As our Rusty Weiss reported at the time, Trump lashed out at the regime. 
"To me, I think it’s over. 
I don’t want to deal with them anymore, but they’re scum," he said. 
You know what scum is? 
They’re scum, they’re sick people, they’re led by sick people, and they’re vicious, violent people. 
In the two-page letter, the president noted that there are no boots on the ground: 
“United States ground forces are not involved in these strikes. 
These strikes are limited, measured, planned and executed in a manner designed to minimize civilian casualties,” the president wrote in the letter, which was obtained by The Hill. 
After the president notifies Congress, the U.S. military can be in the region for 60 days and the commander-in-chief can extend their stay for another 30 days, under the War Powers Act. 
But deployment that exceeds that timeframe requires congressional approval. 
In June, the House passed a War Powers Resolution limiting Trump’s ability to wage war against the despotic regime, but the Senate has repeatedly shot down such efforts, and a bill has never reached the president’s desk. 
It would be very interesting if it did because it could very likely set off a power struggle. 
Many scholars  and the president himself  believe the 1973 War Powers Act is unconstitutional because it infringes on the president's Article II powers as Commander in Chief. 
President Nixon initially vetoed it for that reason, but Congress overrode him, and it’s now the law. 
Stay tuned. 
Editor's Note: For decades, former presidents have been all talk and no action. 
Now, Donald Trump is eliminating the threat from Iran once and for all. 
Help us report the truth about the Trump administration's decisive actions to keep Americans safe and bring peace to the world. 
Join RedState VIP and use promo code FIGHT to get 60% off your VIP membership. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Bob Hoge: 7.1%RedState: 7.0%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Bob Hoge: 0.2%RedState: 0.8%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Bob Hoge: 2.9%RedState: 3.4%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Bob Hoge: 0.7%RedState: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Bob Hoge: 1.2%RedState: 0.9%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 4.2%Bob Hoge: 2.2%RedState: 1.9%Overconfidence Bias4.2%This article: 15.8%Bob Hoge: 10.7%RedState: 9.2%Framing Effect15.8%This article: 0.0%Bob Hoge: 0.6%RedState: 0.5%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Bob Hoge: 0.2%RedState: 0.4%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 2.3%Bob Hoge: 0.2%RedState: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect2.3%This article: 1.8%Bob Hoge: 1.1%RedState: 1.7%Optimism Bias1.8%This article: 0.0%Bob Hoge: 2.4%RedState: 1.7%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 7.9%Bob Hoge: 19.0%RedState: 13.9%Negativity Bias7.9%This article: 1.8%Bob Hoge: 1.5%RedState: 1.8%Self-Serving Bias1.8%This article: 0.0%Bob Hoge: 2.0%RedState: 2.0%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Bob Hoge: 0.3%RedState: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 4.5%Bob Hoge: 6.6%RedState: 4.7%In-Group Bias4.5%This article: 2.0%Bob Hoge: 4.7%RedState: 3.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias2.0%This article: 0.0%Bob Hoge: 1.0%RedState: 2.0%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Bob Hoge: 1.9%RedState: 0.8%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Bob Hoge: 0.0%RedState: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Bob Hoge: 1.7%RedState: 1.2%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Bob Hoge: 0.7%RedState: 0.5%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Bob Hoge: 0.0%RedState: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 3.8%Bob Hoge: 9.1%RedState: 6.9%Ad Hominem3.8%This article: 4.5%Bob Hoge: 4.8%RedState: 2.6%Straw Man4.5%This article: 4.0%Bob Hoge: 2.6%RedState: 3.3%Appeal to Authority4.0%This article: 0.0%Bob Hoge: 2.8%RedState: 2.4%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Bob Hoge: 2.1%RedState: 1.4%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Bob Hoge: 0.2%RedState: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 3.8%Bob Hoge: 13.3%RedState: 10.1%Hasty Generalization3.8%This article: 0.0%Bob Hoge: 0.9%RedState: 0.7%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Bob Hoge: 1.0%RedState: 0.9%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 2.5%Bob Hoge: 12.8%RedState: 8.5%Appeal to Emotion2.5%This article: 2.9%Bob Hoge: 1.7%RedState: 1.8%Begging the Question2.9%This article: 0.0%Bob Hoge: 2.5%RedState: 2.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Bob Hoge: 0.5%RedState: 0.9%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Bob Hoge: 1.1%RedState: 1.2%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Bob Hoge: 0.0%RedState: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Bob Hoge: 0.3%RedState: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Bob Hoge: 2.3%RedState: 2.6%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Bob Hoge: 0.2%RedState: 0.3%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Bob Hoge: 1.7%RedState: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Bob Hoge: 0.0%RedState: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Bob Hoge: 0.0%RedState: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Bob Hoge: 0.2%RedState: 0.2%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Bob Hoge: 0.2%RedState: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Bob Hoge: 0.3%RedState: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Bob Hoge: 2.7%RedState: 2.4%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 1.0%Bob Hoge: 3.0%RedState: 1.8%Quote-first Misdirection1.0%This article: 16.0%Bob Hoge: 31.7%RedState: 21.5%Biased Writer Voice16.0%This article: 4.6%Bob Hoge: 5.8%RedState: 4.8%Indoctrination4.6%This article: 0.0%Bob Hoge: 0.2%RedState: 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Bob Hoge: 21.9%RedState: 15.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 4.9%Bob Hoge: 4.1%RedState: 3.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…4.9%

733 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker25%attributed speech551writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 44 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 16 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 17 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 18 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 6 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 13 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 5 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 10 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Donald Trump

45%flagged-word coverage
182 attributed words100% of attributed speech41% writer coverage
0%12.5%25.0%Biased Writer Voice-21.2 ptsWriter: 21.2%Donald Trump: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -6.5 ptsWriter: 6.5%Donald Trump: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-6.2 ptsWriter: 6.2%Donald Trump: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-1.3 ptsWriter: 1.3%Donald Trump: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.