Keyword summary
73% 14 analyzed articles/videos 15,695 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Military Strikes results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Overconfidence Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 19.5% saturation with 9,805 hits . Analysis detected 62,829 faulty-reasoning hits from 50,321 analyzed words across 14 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 38% (22,212 of 35,675 keywords). This Military Strikes is better (less manipulative) than 62.30% of the peer group. Military Strikes
Keyword details
Total words: 50,321
Article count: 14
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
38% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 37.7% percentile 2.4% BS Score14 analyzed articles50.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 11.8% 11.8% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 19.5% 19.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 11.3% 11.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 8.5% 8.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 19.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 11.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 9.1% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 4.6% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 3.1% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 3.7% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst