Topic summary
⁠37%3 analyzed articles/videos733 analyzed words
BS Summary: These War Powers Act results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.3% saturation with 1,029 hits. Analysis detected 7,362 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,095 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠28% (12,008 of 16,562 topics). This War Powers Act is better (less manipulative) than 72.50% of the peer group.
War Powers Act
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 9,095
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

28% percentile
025507510027.5% percentile
2.1% BS Score3 analyzed articles9.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 11.3%11.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.7%5.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.1%10.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.8%0.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.6%0.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.0%1.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 9.5%9.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.9%2.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 4.6%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 1.4%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos