Keyword summary
42% 5 analyzed articles/videos 1,954 analyzed words
BS Summary: These War Powers Act results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.8% saturation with 1,586 hits . Analysis detected 11,825 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,727 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 19% (30,670 of 37,536 keywords). This War Powers Act is better (less manipulative) than 81.70% of the peer group. War Powers Act
Keyword details
Total words: 14,727
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
18% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 18.3% percentile 1.8% BS Score5 analyzed articles14.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 10.8% 10.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.8% 5.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 9.6% 9.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.1% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst