Topic summary
27% 10 analyzed articles/videos 18,904 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kentucky results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Ad Hominem , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10% saturation with 6,039 hits . Analysis detected 39,069 faulty-reasoning hits from 60,516 analyzed words across 10 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 6% (14,924 of 15,753 topics). This Kentucky is better (less manipulative) than 94.70% of the peer group. Kentucky
Topic details
Total words: 60,516
Article count: 10
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
5% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 5.3% percentile 1.4% BS Score10 analyzed articles60.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.6% 5.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.3% 4.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 10.0% 10.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.8% 0.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Ad Hominem: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 2.2% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst