Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,549 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Victoria Churchill results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Ad Hominem , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 26.7% saturation with 1,437 hits . Analysis detected 6,271 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,372 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of 71% (1,872 of 6,366 authors). This Victoria Churchill is worse (more manipulative) than 70.60% of the peer group. Victoria Churchill
Author details
Total words: 5,372
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
71% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 70.6% percentile 3.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 17.7% 17.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 16.4% 16.4% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 12.6% 12.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.7% 5.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.5% 0.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 26.8% 26.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.6% 0.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 3.0% 3.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 16.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 26.8%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 17.7%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.7%, sitewide 15.9% Ad Hominem: Author 12.6%, sitewide 2.2% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 1.4% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.6%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.1% Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst