Author summary
0%4 analyzed articles/videos913 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hannah Knowles results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Hasty Generalization, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 24% saturation with 713 hits. Analysis detected 4,839 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,971 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.8% and a BS Rank of 82% (1,182 of 6,521 authors). This Hannah Knowles is worse (more manipulative) than 81.90% of the peer group.
Hannah Knowles
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
82%Hannah Knowles (selected)5%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,971
Article count: 4
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

82% percentile
025507510081.9% percentile
4.8% BS Score4 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 22.2%22.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.5%3.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 8.8%8.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.4%3.4%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 5.0%5.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.0%1.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 2.1%2.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.8%0.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.5%0.5%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 5.0%5.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 24.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 22.4%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Author 22.2%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.5%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 9.8%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 2.0%Anecdotal: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 5.0%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Author 5.0%, sitewide 1.1%False Dilemma: Author 5.0%, sitewide 1.5%Self-Serving Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 3.7%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Ad Hominem: Author 3.9%, sitewide 2.2%No True Scotsman: Author 3.5%, sitewide 0.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate