Topic summary
58% 40 analyzed articles/videos 33,632 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jeffrey Epstein results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.5% saturation with 20,035 hits . Analysis detected 133,185 faulty-reasoning hits from 148,070 analyzed words across 40 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 13% (14,311 of 16,316 topics). This Jeffrey Epstein is better (less manipulative) than 87.70% of the peer group. Jeffrey Epstein
Topic details
Total words: 148,070
Article count: 40
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
12% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 12.3% percentile 1.7% BS Score40 analyzed articles148.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 9.4% 9.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.5% 5.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 13.5% 13.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.9% 1.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.3% 4.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 13.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Ad Hominem: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.2% Bandwagon: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst