Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Daniel Ruetenik results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Ambiguity (Equivocation) , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 19.1% saturation with 443 hits . Analysis detected 1,441 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,316 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,359 authors). This Daniel Ruetenik is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Daniel Ruetenik
Author details
Total words: 2,316
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.5% 2.5% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 19.1% 19.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.7% 0.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.7% 7.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.3% 1.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.3% 1.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.9% 0.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.3% 1.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.9% 2.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.7%, sitewide 19.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 19.1%, sitewide 3.7% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.9%, sitewide 0.8% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.8%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Hindsight Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.4% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.1% Special Pleading: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst