Raw Story⁠93%

'Piece of meat': Beauty queen reveals Trump's disturbing question after alleged assault ⁠63%

By Kathleen Culliton⁠79%

7/1/2026, 8:16:05 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 22 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Biased Writer Voice, and Confirmation Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 46.3% saturation with 199 hits. Analysis detected 1,288 faulty-reasoning hits from 430 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 57.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠63% (8,297 of 21,886 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 62.10% of the article peer group.

A former beauty queen says President Donald Trump asked her a disturbing question after an alleged sexual assault she says occurred decades ago, according to a new report. 
Former Miss Europe contestant Beatrice Keul, 55, told PunchUp on Wednesday that Trump — whom she accuses of sexually assaulting her at the Plaza Hotel in 1993 — proceeded to grill her about Jeffrey Epstein. 
“Have you spoken to Jeff?” 
Trump allegedly asked. 
Interviewer Tom Latchem added, "Keul told PunchUp that this suggested to her that he and Epstein were coordinating which young women would be invited to private parties, including at Mar-a-Lago." 
Keul, then 23, says she received a personal invitation from the then-real estate mogul to participate in the Donald J. 
Trump American Dream Pageant, according to reports. 
On Wednesday, Keul described the pageant as a “playground” for Epstein, the convicted sex criminal who died in a New York City jail cell before he could face sex trafficking charges, and the men who wanted his help securing access to her fellow contestants. 
“They knew exactly what they wanted,” Keul reportedly said. 
“I was fresh meat.” 
Epstein promised young women flights, hotel stays and invites to parties at Mar-a-Lago, Trump’s resort in Palm Beach, Florida, Keul told PunchUp. 
But White House spokesperson Abigail Jackson denied Keul’s claims. 
“Just as President Trump has said, he’s been totally exonerated on anything relating to Epstein,” Jackson said in a statement to PunchUp. 
“And by releasing thousands of pages of documents, cooperating with the House Oversight Committee’s subpoena request, signing the Epstein Files Transparency Act, and calling for more investigations into Epstein’s Democrat friends, President Trump has done more for Epstein’s victims than anyone before him.” 
Keul is hardly the first person to levy such accusations against Trump. 
When Keul first revealed her accusations to the Daily Beast in 2024, she became the 28th person to accuse him of sexual assault. 
An explosive FBI interview buried in the Epstein files aligns with Keul’s description of her encounter with Trump. 
That witness accused Trump of orchestrating a team of recruiters to search Trump Tower for women to have sex with, the files show. 
In 2020, former contestants of Elite Model Management’s Look of the Year competition in 1991 and 1992 told the Guardian Trump appeared backstage as they changed clothes. 
“Every time we changed, it was like Trump would find a reason to come backstage,” said Stacy Wilkes, then 16. 
Another contestant recalled similar instances. 
“I remember thinking, what have I got myself into?” 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 23.0%Kathleen Culliton: 7.4%Rawstory: 8.4%Confirmation Bias23.0%This article: 0.0%Kathleen Culliton: 0.7%Rawstory: 0.8%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 4.0%Kathleen Culliton: 5.5%Rawstory: 4.5%Availability Heuristic4.0%This article: 5.3%Kathleen Culliton: 1.1%Rawstory: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic5.3%This article: 0.0%Kathleen Culliton: 0.3%Rawstory: 1.0%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathleen Culliton: 2.8%Rawstory: 2.2%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathleen Culliton: 13.5%Rawstory: 13.4%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathleen Culliton: 0.2%Rawstory: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathleen Culliton: 0.0%Rawstory: 0.4%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathleen Culliton: 0.0%Rawstory: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathleen Culliton: 0.5%Rawstory: 0.7%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathleen Culliton: 2.2%Rawstory: 2.9%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 23.0%Kathleen Culliton: 21.4%Rawstory: 21.6%Negativity Bias23.0%This article: 10.0%Kathleen Culliton: 2.2%Rawstory: 1.2%Self-Serving Bias10.0%This article: 0.0%Kathleen Culliton: 2.7%Rawstory: 2.8%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathleen Culliton: 0.1%Rawstory: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathleen Culliton: 0.7%Rawstory: 2.5%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathleen Culliton: 0.4%Rawstory: 1.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 5.1%Kathleen Culliton: 0.7%Rawstory: 0.6%Halo Effect5.1%This article: 0.0%Kathleen Culliton: 1.1%Rawstory: 0.9%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathleen Culliton: 0.0%Rawstory: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathleen Culliton: 2.2%Rawstory: 1.8%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathleen Culliton: 0.2%Rawstory: 0.7%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathleen Culliton: 0.0%Rawstory: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathleen Culliton: 5.9%Rawstory: 6.3%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathleen Culliton: 0.8%Rawstory: 0.7%Straw Man0.0%This article: 15.1%Kathleen Culliton: 4.0%Rawstory: 4.1%Appeal to Authority15.1%This article: 10.0%Kathleen Culliton: 2.0%Rawstory: 3.0%False Dilemma10.0%This article: 0.0%Kathleen Culliton: 0.7%Rawstory: 1.5%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathleen Culliton: 0.1%Rawstory: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 20.2%Kathleen Culliton: 12.4%Rawstory: 12.1%Hasty Generalization20.2%This article: 0.0%Kathleen Culliton: 1.3%Rawstory: 0.7%Red Herring0.0%This article: 5.3%Kathleen Culliton: 1.4%Rawstory: 0.8%Bandwagon5.3%This article: 5.8%Kathleen Culliton: 8.4%Rawstory: 9.2%Appeal to Emotion5.8%This article: 0.0%Kathleen Culliton: 1.3%Rawstory: 1.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 6.3%Kathleen Culliton: 3.7%Rawstory: 3.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)6.3%This article: 0.0%Kathleen Culliton: 0.4%Rawstory: 0.6%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 10.0%Kathleen Culliton: 2.4%Rawstory: 1.7%Burden of Proof10.0%This article: 0.0%Kathleen Culliton: 0.2%Rawstory: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathleen Culliton: 0.6%Rawstory: 0.5%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 46.3%Kathleen Culliton: 4.4%Rawstory: 3.9%Anecdotal46.3%This article: 0.0%Kathleen Culliton: 0.3%Rawstory: 0.3%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 17.4%Kathleen Culliton: 2.0%Rawstory: 2.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)17.4%This article: 0.0%Kathleen Culliton: 0.0%Rawstory: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathleen Culliton: 0.0%Rawstory: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathleen Culliton: 0.2%Rawstory: 0.2%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathleen Culliton: 0.2%Rawstory: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 2.1%Kathleen Culliton: 0.1%Rawstory: 0.4%Genetic Fallacy2.1%This article: 31.2%Kathleen Culliton: 4.9%Rawstory: 5.3%Unattributed Quote31.2%This article: 3.7%Kathleen Culliton: 5.8%Rawstory: 4.1%Quote-first Misdirection3.7%This article: 30.5%Kathleen Culliton: 16.5%Rawstory: 15.7%Biased Writer Voice30.5%This article: 10.0%Kathleen Culliton: 0.9%Rawstory: 3.2%Indoctrination10.0%This article: 5.1%Kathleen Culliton: 5.6%Rawstory: 8.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias5.1%This article: 10.0%Kathleen Culliton: 2.2%Rawstory: 1.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias10.0%This article: 0.0%Kathleen Culliton: 0.4%Rawstory: 0.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

430 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers60%attributed speech172writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 100.0% coverageBeatrice Keul • 35 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageTom Latchem • 30 words • 100.0% coverageBeatrice Keul • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageBeatrice Keul • 44 words • 100.0% coverageBeatrice Keul • 9 words • 100.0% coverageBeatrice Keul • 4 words • 100.0% coverageBeatrice Keul • 22 words • 100.0% coverageAbigail Jackson • 9 words • 0.0% coverageAbigail Jackson • 22 words • 100.0% coverageAbigail Jackson • 43 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 100.0% coverageStacy Wilkes • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Abigail Jackson

100%flagged-word coverage
74 attributed words29% of attributed speech98% writer coverage
0%30.0%60.0%Indoctrination+58.1 ptsWriter: 0.0%Abigail Jackson: 58.1%58.1%Politically Right Leaning +58.1 ptsWriter: 0.0%Abigail Jackson: 58.1%58.1%Unattributed Quote-55.2 ptsWriter: 55.2%Abigail Jackson: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice+12.3 ptsWriter: 17.4%Abigail Jackson: 29.7%29.7%Quote-first Misdirection-7.0 ptsWriter: 7.0%Abigail Jackson: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.