Topic summary
74% 22 analyzed articles/videos 12,375 analyzed words
BS Summary: These International Conflict results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.6% saturation with 7,923 hits . Analysis detected 63,135 faulty-reasoning hits from 54,106 analyzed words across 22 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 31% (11,504 of 16,562 topics). This International Conflict is better (less manipulative) than 69.50% of the peer group. International Conflict
Topic details
Total words: 54,106
Article count: 22
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
31% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 30.5% percentile 2.2% BS Score22 analyzed articles54.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 13.5% 13.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 8.9% 8.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.4% 4.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.5% 3.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 10.4% 10.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 14.6% 14.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.9% 3.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 13.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 14.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.1%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 2.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.1% Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.1% Ad Hominem: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst