Author summary
94% 1 analyzed article/video 1,223 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ahmad Ibsais results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 2,446 hits . Analysis detected 11,082 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,892 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.1% and a BS Rank of 91% (610 of 6,278 authors). This Ahmad Ibsais is worse (more manipulative) than 90.30% of the peer group. Ahmad Ibsais
Author details
Total words: 4,892
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
90% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 90.3% percentile 7.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 50.0% 50.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.8% 8.8% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 17.5% 17.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.3% 0.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 18.0% 18.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 17.2% 17.2% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Author 10.1% 10.1% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 7.0% 7.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 22.4% 22.4% Straw Man Sitewide 0.9% Author 7.2% 7.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Biased Writer Voice: Author 50.0%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Author 8.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 25.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 22.4%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 18.0%, sitewide 8.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 17.5%, sitewide 2.0% Confirmation Bias: Author 17.2%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.3%, sitewide 11.1% Begging the Question: Author 10.1%, sitewide 1.7% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.7%, sitewide 9.1% False Dilemma: Author 7.2%, sitewide 1.5% Straw Man: Author 7.2%, sitewide 0.9% Indoctrination: Author 7.0%, sitewide 0.0% In-Group Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 6.9% Anecdotal: Author 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Slippery Slope: Author 4.6%, sitewide 1.7% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst