BS Summary: This article contains 22 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Unattributed Quote, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 41.1% saturation with 187 hits. Analysis detected 1,015 faulty-reasoning hits from 455 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 45.5% and a BS Rank of 41% (13,032 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 59.50% of the article peer group.

A separatist group in Papua, New Guinea, admitted to shooting an American pilot transporting troops into a conflict zone. 
The group claimed on Thursday that the pilot failed to heed its warnings, according to NBC News. 
A Papua separatist group said Thursday it has shot dead an American pilot who brought Indonesian troops into a ‘conflict zone.’ 
In a statement, Sebby Sambom, spokesman for the West Papua Liberation Army, or TPNPB, claimed the group’s fighters in Yahukimo regency shot dead American pilot Nicholas F. 
Goselin and set fire to an aircraft operated by PT AMA, an Indonesian airline, in Balinggama village. 
There was no immediate comment from the Indonesian military or the U.S. 
Embassy. 
The Transportation Ministry’s Directorate General of Civil Aviation said the plane was carrying one pilot and seven passengers. 
After the pilot reported that the aircraft had landed, communications with personnel at the airstrip were subsequently lost, the ministry said in a statement. 
Papua police’s Cartenz Peace Task Force unit said they were still working to verify the condition of the pilot and the seven passengers and expected to deploy a team there on Friday. 
Sambom said the aircraft was targeted because it allegedly violated a TPNPB ultimatum banning civilian flights from entering areas the separatist group considers its operational zones. 
There was no immediate information on the Indonesians who had been on board. 
The spokesman alleged that civilian aircraft have been used to transport Indonesian military personnel and logistics into Papua’s remote interior and said the pilot was killed because the aircraft continued operating despite the group’s warning. 
The claims could not be independently verified. 
The spokesman said the shooting was “the result of the failure of the Indonesian, U.S. and Dutch governments, as well as the United Nations, to address the root causes of the conflict in Papua, which has persisted for 64 years.” 
The West Papua National Liberation Army is the armed wing of the Free Papua Movement, a separatist group dedicated to obtaining independence for West Papua from Indonesia. 
Reuters reported that the organization was responsible for the killings of eight civilians in May. 
The group said the victims were members of Indonesian military intelligence officers disguised as gold miners. 
TPNPB soldiers typically operate in remote highland areas, using guerrilla tactics against the Indonesian military. 
The group was formed in the mid 1960s to separate West Papua from Indonesia and establish an independent state through armed struggle. 
Editor's Note: Do you enjoy Townhall's conservative reporting that takes on the radical left and woke media? 
Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth. 
Join Townhall VIP and use promo code FIGHT to receive 60% off your membership. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 7.7%Jeff Charles: 2.4%Townhall: 5.3%Confirmation Bias7.7%This article: 0.0%Jeff Charles: 0.0%Townhall: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 5.5%Jeff Charles: 0.7%Townhall: 2.8%Availability Heuristic5.5%This article: 3.3%Jeff Charles: 0.4%Townhall: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic3.3%This article: 0.0%Jeff Charles: 0.0%Townhall: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 7.0%Jeff Charles: 0.9%Townhall: 1.7%Overconfidence Bias7.0%This article: 41.1%Jeff Charles: 13.7%Townhall: 11.2%Framing Effect41.1%This article: 0.0%Jeff Charles: 0.0%Townhall: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Charles: 0.0%Townhall: 0.3%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Charles: 0.0%Townhall: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Charles: 0.0%Townhall: 1.4%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Charles: 0.0%Townhall: 1.9%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 29.9%Jeff Charles: 7.9%Townhall: 13.5%Negativity Bias29.9%This article: 6.4%Jeff Charles: 0.8%Townhall: 1.8%Self-Serving Bias6.4%This article: 0.0%Jeff Charles: 0.0%Townhall: 1.8%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Charles: 0.0%Townhall: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Charles: 1.0%Townhall: 4.6%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Charles: 0.5%Townhall: 3.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Charles: 0.0%Townhall: 1.8%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Charles: 0.0%Townhall: 0.9%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Charles: 0.0%Townhall: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Charles: 0.8%Townhall: 1.3%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Charles: 0.2%Townhall: 0.6%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Charles: 0.0%Townhall: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Charles: 0.0%Townhall: 5.0%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Charles: 0.0%Townhall: 2.0%Straw Man0.0%This article: 11.0%Jeff Charles: 2.5%Townhall: 4.4%Appeal to Authority11.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Charles: 1.1%Townhall: 1.9%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Charles: 0.0%Townhall: 1.6%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Charles: 0.9%Townhall: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 11.0%Jeff Charles: 3.4%Townhall: 9.1%Hasty Generalization11.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Charles: 0.0%Townhall: 0.6%Red Herring0.0%This article: 3.7%Jeff Charles: 1.9%Townhall: 1.3%Bandwagon3.7%This article: 6.6%Jeff Charles: 4.6%Townhall: 11.1%Appeal to Emotion6.6%This article: 5.7%Jeff Charles: 1.1%Townhall: 2.2%Begging the Question5.7%This article: 16.5%Jeff Charles: 3.3%Townhall: 2.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)16.5%This article: 0.0%Jeff Charles: 0.0%Townhall: 0.6%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 4.4%Jeff Charles: 1.5%Townhall: 1.5%Burden of Proof4.4%This article: 0.0%Jeff Charles: 0.0%Townhall: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Charles: 0.0%Townhall: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Charles: 0.0%Townhall: 1.4%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 3.5%Jeff Charles: 0.5%Townhall: 0.1%No True Scotsman3.5%This article: 5.7%Jeff Charles: 1.3%Townhall: 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)5.7%This article: 0.0%Jeff Charles: 0.0%Townhall: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Charles: 0.0%Townhall: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Charles: 0.0%Townhall: 0.2%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Charles: 1.1%Townhall: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Charles: 0.0%Townhall: 0.4%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 28.8%Jeff Charles: 4.6%Townhall: 3.4%Unattributed Quote28.8%This article: 1.5%Jeff Charles: 3.7%Townhall: 3.0%Quote-first Misdirection1.5%This article: 3.7%Jeff Charles: 6.3%Townhall: 16.1%Biased Writer Voice3.7%This article: 6.6%Jeff Charles: 5.1%Townhall: 5.6%Indoctrination6.6%This article: 0.0%Jeff Charles: 0.0%Townhall: 0.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 3.7%Jeff Charles: 5.8%Townhall: 13.8%Politically Right Leaning Bias3.7%This article: 9.7%Jeff Charles: 7.7%Townhall: 5.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…9.7%

455 words analyzed.

Speakers

5speakers38%attributed speech282writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageSebby Sambom • 27 words • 0.0% coverageSebby Sambom • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageTransportation Ministry’s Directorate General of Civil Aviation • 18 words • 0.0% coverageTransportation Ministry’s Directorate General of Civil Aviation • 24 words • 0.0% coveragePapua police’s Cartenz Peace Task Force unit • 32 words • 0.0% coverageSebby Sambom • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 40 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageReuters • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageTownhall VIP • 14 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Reuters

100%flagged-word coverage
15 attributed words8.7% of attributed speech100% writer coverage
0%25.0%50.0%Unattributed Quote-46.5 ptsWriter: 46.5%Reuters: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-10.6 ptsWriter: 10.6%Reuters: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -10.6 ptsWriter: 10.6%Reuters: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-6.0 ptsWriter: 6.0%Reuters: 0.0%0.0%Politically Right Leaning -6.0 ptsWriter: 6.0%Reuters: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-2.5 ptsWriter: 2.5%Reuters: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.