Topic summary
45% 16 analyzed articles/videos 15,623 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Indigenous Rights results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.9% saturation with 8,371 hits . Analysis detected 66,922 faulty-reasoning hits from 70,472 analyzed words across 16 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 20% (12,523 of 15,527 topics). This Indigenous Rights is better (less manipulative) than 80.70% of the peer group. Indigenous Rights
Topic details
Total words: 70,472
Article count: 16
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
19% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 19.3% percentile 1.9% BS Score16 analyzed articles70.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 9.0% 9.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 8.2% 8.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 11.9% 11.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.2% 4.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.3% 1.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 11.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.0% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst