Author summary
36% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,276 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Te Aniwaniwa Paterson results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.5% saturation with 865 hits . Analysis detected 6,543 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,104 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 26% (4,588 of 6,195 authors). This Te Aniwaniwa Paterson is better (less manipulative) than 74.10% of the peer group. Te Aniwaniwa Paterson
Author details
Total words: 9,104
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
26% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 25.9% percentile 1.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles9.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.4% 7.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.1% 4.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.5% 9.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.3% 1.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.0% 1.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.6% 1.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.4% 1.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.0% 3.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.6% 1.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 7.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.7%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 2.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Indoctrination: Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.0% False Dilemma: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.8% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst