Author summary
83% 1 analyzed article/video 1,223 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kyle Davidson results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and Red Herring , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 19.4% saturation with 712 hits . Analysis detected 3,879 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,669 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of 76% (1,562 of 6,347 authors). This Kyle Davidson is worse (more manipulative) than 75.40% of the peer group. Kyle Davidson
Author details
Total words: 3,669
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
75% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 75.4% percentile 4.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 9.4% 9.4% Red Herring Sitewide 0.7% Author 8.8% 8.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.2% 1.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.6% 3.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.9% 0.9% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 0.7% 0.7% Tu Quoque Sitewide 0.2% Author 2.5% 2.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 3.9% 3.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 18.0% 18.0% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Author 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 9.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 19.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 18.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.2%, sitewide 9.1% Red Herring: Author 8.8%, sitewide 0.7% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.4%, sitewide 5.3% Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 3.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Tu Quoque: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.2% Bandwagon: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.4% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.5% Burden of Proof: Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst