Topic summary
41% 32 analyzed articles/videos 21,656 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Government Funding results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.7% saturation with 11,050 hits . Analysis detected 93,614 faulty-reasoning hits from 103,388 analyzed words across 32 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 13% (13,777 of 15,755 topics). This Government Funding is better (less manipulative) than 87.40% of the peer group. Government Funding
Topic details
Total words: 103,388
Article count: 32
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
13% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 12.6% percentile 1.7% BS Score32 analyzed articles103.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 7.6% 7.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 7.3% 7.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 10.7% 10.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.2% 3.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.8% 2.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.3% 4.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst