Author summary
33% 1 analyzed article/video 1,268 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Briah Lumpkins results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 5.1% saturation with 193 hits . Analysis detected 2,385 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,804 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 18% (5,137 of 6,215 authors). This Briah Lumpkins is better (less manipulative) than 82.70% of the peer group. Briah Lumpkins
Author details
Total words: 3,804
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
17% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 17.3% percentile 1.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.8% 4.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.4% 3.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.2% 4.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.8% 1.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.9% 4.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.7% 1.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.0% 1.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.2% 0.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.8% 1.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.7% Loss Aversion: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst