Topic summary
59% 23 analyzed articles/videos 13,851 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fiscal Policy results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 9.8% saturation with 6,980 hits . Analysis detected 75,851 faulty-reasoning hits from 71,488 analyzed words across 23 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 22% (12,134 of 15,447 topics). This Fiscal Policy is better (less manipulative) than 78.60% of the peer group. Fiscal Policy
Topic details
Total words: 71,488
Article count: 23
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
21% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 21.4% percentile 2.0% BS Score23 analyzed articles71.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 8.2% 8.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.9% 4.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 8.7% 8.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.9% 4.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 9.8% 9.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.4%, sitewide 3.3% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.4% Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst