Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Medora Lee results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Negativity Bias, and Loss Aversion, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 8.8% saturation with 272 hits. Analysis detected 2,027 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,105 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,361 authors). This Medora Lee is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Medora Lee
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
0%Medora Lee (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 3,105
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.8%3.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.2%2.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 5.7%5.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 0.6%0.6%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Author 5.5%5.5%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Author 5.6%5.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 2.4%2.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 8.8%8.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 2.5%2.5%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Author 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 5.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 8.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 7.0%, sitewide 8.1%Loss Aversion: Author 5.6%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 1.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 4.2%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 3.7%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 4.0%Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.1%Dunning-Kruger Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.1%Primacy Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.9%Composition/Division: Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos