Publication summary
62% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,228 analyzed words
BS Summary: These The Sanford Herald results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Hasty Generalization , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13% saturation with 1,387 hits . Analysis detected 9,648 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,688 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 61% (149 of 379 publications). This The Sanford Herald is worse (more manipulative) than 60.80% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 10,688
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
61% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 60.8% percentile 2.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles10.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 13.0% 13.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 9.2% 9.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 8.2% 8.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 4.6% 4.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 2.9% 2.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 1.4% 1.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Publication 1.0% 1.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 1.8% 1.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 2.6% 2.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Publication 1.7% 1.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 13.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 9.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 8.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 4.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 7.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 1.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 3.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 1.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 2.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 3.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Publication 3.2%, sitewide 1.4% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Publication 2.9%, sitewide 1.5% Begging the Question: Publication 2.9%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst