Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Tanya Rawat results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Negativity Bias, and Pessimism Bias, with Slippery Slope as the most egregious example at 18.8% saturation with 279 hits. Analysis detected 1,760 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,485 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,252 authors). This Tanya Rawat is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Tanya Rawat
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
0%Tanya Rawat (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 1,485
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 6.1%6.1%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Author 18.8%18.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 6.6%6.6%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Author 10.4%10.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 10.8%10.8%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Author 9.0%9.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.3%1.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 10.1%10.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 2.1%2.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 2.7%2.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 6.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 10.8%, sitewide 19.2%Slippery Slope: Author 18.8%, sitewide 1.7%Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 14.9%, sitewide 11.1%Pessimism Bias: Author 10.4%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Author 10.1%, sitewide 4.0%Availability Heuristic: Author 7.3%, sitewide 9.1%Loss Aversion: Author 9.0%, sitewide 2.5%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.8%, sitewide 5.3%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.5%Red Herring: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.1%Indoctrination: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.0%Middle Ground: Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos