Topic summary
69% 11 analyzed articles/videos 8,438 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Epstein Files results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Anecdotal , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.3% saturation with 4,611 hits . Analysis detected 35,958 faulty-reasoning hits from 34,576 analyzed words across 11 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 27% (11,380 of 15,535 topics). This Epstein Files is better (less manipulative) than 73.30% of the peer group. Epstein Files
Topic details
Total words: 34,576
Article count: 11
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
27% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 26.7% percentile 2.1% BS Score11 analyzed articles34.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 10.5% 10.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.1% 4.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 8.9% 8.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 13.3% 13.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.5% 3.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.2% 4.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 13.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 3.7% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Hindsight Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.4% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst
MS NOW 94% 12/24/2025, 4:12:50 AM