Author summary
0%4 analyzed articles/videos1,077 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Casey Morell results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 10.7% saturation with 3,170 hits. Analysis detected 22,954 faulty-reasoning hits from 29,747 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 23% (4,900 of 6,365 authors). This Casey Morell is better (less manipulative) than 77.00% of the peer group.
Casey Morell
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
23%Casey Morell (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 29,747
Article count: 4
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

23% percentile
025507510023.0% percentile
1.8% BS Score4 analyzed articles29.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 7.5%7.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 6.5%6.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 5.3%5.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.2%2.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.6%2.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.2%1.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.9%0.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.1%2.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 10.7%10.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.9%1.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 7.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.2%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Author 10.7%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 4.6%Recency Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.1%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate