Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Nermeen Shaikh results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Confirmation Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 675 hits . Analysis detected 6,081 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,471 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,348 authors). This Nermeen Shaikh is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Nermeen Shaikh
Author details
Total words: 6,471
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.1% 6.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.2% 9.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.3% 1.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.2% 2.2% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 6.2% 6.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.9% 0.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 10.4% 10.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.1% 1.1% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.4% 0.4% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Author 4.3% 4.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 10.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 8.9%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.5%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Indoctrination: Author 6.2%, sitewide 0.0% Optimism Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Begging the Question: Author 4.3%, sitewide 1.7% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.3%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Ad Hominem: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst