Author summary
0% 5 analyzed articles/videos 3,783 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ashley Oliver results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Politically Right Leaning Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 22.4% saturation with 3,030 hits . Analysis detected 21,744 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,518 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of 73% (1,730 of 6,410 authors). This Ashley Oliver is worse (more manipulative) than 73.00% of the peer group. Ashley Oliver
Author details
Total words: 13,518
Article count: 5
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
73% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 73.0% percentile 3.8% BS Score5 analyzed articles13.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Author 13.4% 13.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 12.0% 12.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.7% 2.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 11.2% 11.2% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 22.2% 22.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.5% 6.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.9% 2.9% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 5.5% 5.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 2.0% 2.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 22.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 22.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 11.2%, sitewide 15.9% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 13.4%, sitewide 1.4% Biased Writer Voice: Author 12.0%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 6.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Ad Hominem: Author 5.5%, sitewide 2.2% Anecdotal: Author 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 3.1% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.3%, sitewide 3.3% Hindsight Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst