Pirro closes investigation into Federal Reserve over building project 81%

By Ashley Oliver0% Alex Nitzberg0%

4/24/2026, 2:35:53 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 23 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Framing Effect, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 14.4% saturation with 120 hits. Analysis detected 1,032 faulty-reasoning hits from 831 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 72.9% and a BS Rank of 81% (4,040 of 21,188 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 80.90% of the article peer group.

U.S. 
Attorney for the District of Columbia Jeanine Pirro announced Friday she directed her office to close its investigation into the Federal Reserve over a building project, a move that could lead a key Senate holdout to now vote to advance President Donald Trump's nominee for Fed chair. 
Pirro said the Fed's inspector general, Michael Horowitz, would take over the investigation, moving it from the hands of federal prosecutors into those of a longtime government watchdog. 
The move relieves pressure on the central bank amid a fight over an anticipated leadership change in mid-May, when Fed Chairman Jerome Powell's term is set to end. 
Retiring Sen. 
Thom Tillis, R-N.C., had been threatening to block Kevin Warsh, Trump's successor to Powell, over the Department of Justice's probe. 
"This morning the Inspector General for the Federal Reserve has been asked to scrutinize the building costs overruns  in the billions of dollars  that have been borne by taxpayers," Pirro wrote on X. 
"The IG has the authority to hold the Federal Reserve accountable to American taxpayers. 
I expect a comprehensive report in short order and am confident the outcome will assist in resolving, once and for all, the questions that led this office to issue subpoenas." 
DOJ'S CRIMINAL PROBE OF FED CHAIR POWELL SPARKS RARE GOP REVOLT ON CAPITOL HILL 
"Accordingly, I have directed my office to close our investigation as the IG undertakes this inquiry," Pirro said, adding that she would "not hesitate" to reopen a criminal investigation "should the facts warrant doing so." 
Pirro's comments come after Powell revealed in a video announcement in January that the Department of Justice had opened an investigation into the Fed, calling it an unprecedented attempt to use "intimidation" to force him to lower interest rates. 
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt emphasized on Friday to reporters that the case was not over and is "just being moved over to the inspector general who has critical tools at their disposal to continue to look into the financial mismanagement at the Fed." 
Leavitt added that the Fed renovations have been "going on for a very long time. 
It's costing taxpayers billions of dollars, and I think it's in the best interest of the taxpayer to get to the bottom of it. 
So the investigation still continues. 
It's just under a different authority." 
The DOJ investigation had encountered a significant roadblock after Judge James Boasberg, chief judge of the federal district court in Washington, D.C., blocked the department from subpoenaing the Fed. 
POWELL SAYS HE HAS ‘NO INTENTION OF LEAVING’ FED DURING DOJ INVESTIGATION 
In the lead-up to the investigation, Trump and Powell's relationship had grown increasingly rocky, as Trump became frustrated over interest rates and began targeting Powell, whom he nominated in 2017. 
Trump called Powell a "fool" and demanded in March that he drop rates "immediately." 
Tillis, who has a background in finance and sits on the Senate Banking Committee, had vowed to block Kevin Warsh's confirmation because of the DOJ's investigation, after Trump nominated Warsh to replace Powell, whose term was set to expire on May 15. 
Tillis had claimed the DOJ's investigation was political and would improperly interfere with markets, and he accused Pirro of seeking "brownie points" with Trump by opening it. 
"It's not cute," Tillis had said during a television interview in February. 
During his confirmation hearing this week, Tillis told Warsh, who previously served on the Fed's Board of Governors, that he had "extraordinary credentials" but that he could not vote to advance his nomination in the Senate until the DOJ ended its investigation. 
Fox News Digital reached out to Tillis about Pirro's announcement. 
Horowitz, who will now investigate the Fed building renovation costs, had drawn a mix of praise and criticism from Republicans while serving as DOJ inspector general for more than a decade. 
He was one of the few high-profile inspectors general spared during Trump's historic cull of government watchdogs last year and has found allyship in key figures like House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan, R-Ohio. 
Horowitz became known in part for investigating the FBI's probe of the Trump 2016 campaign's ties to Russia. 
He found in 2019 that the bureau made "significant errors or omissions" when seeking approval from the court of Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act warrants, a finding that sparked widespread demands for FISA reforms that remain a source of controversy on Capitol Hill to this day. 
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP 
Still, some in Trump's base were disappointed when Horowitz released a long-anticipated report in 2024 finding that while the FBI had roughly two dozen sources around D.C. during the Jan. 
6 Capitol breach, the bureau had not directed any of them to enter the Capitol or otherwise break the law, debunking a theory that federal authorities had helped cause the riot. 
Horowitz left the DOJ last year after Powell appointed him to oversee the Fed and Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 10.1%Ashley Oliver: 5.5%FoxBusiness: 4.4%Confirmation Bias10.1%This article: 0.0%Ashley Oliver: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 3.5%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 5.4%Ashley Oliver: 2.7%FoxBusiness: 4.1%Availability Heuristic5.4%This article: 3.7%Ashley Oliver: 0.4%FoxBusiness: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic3.7%This article: 3.7%Ashley Oliver: 2.8%FoxBusiness: 0.7%Hindsight Bias3.7%This article: 3.6%Ashley Oliver: 1.6%FoxBusiness: 3.7%Overconfidence Bias3.6%This article: 7.9%Ashley Oliver: 22.2%FoxBusiness: 13.0%Framing Effect7.9%This article: 0.0%Ashley Oliver: 0.7%FoxBusiness: 1.5%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 5.8%Ashley Oliver: 1.4%FoxBusiness: 1.1%Status Quo Bias5.8%This article: 0.0%Ashley Oliver: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 3.6%Ashley Oliver: 1.1%FoxBusiness: 8.8%Optimism Bias3.6%This article: 3.4%Ashley Oliver: 1.7%FoxBusiness: 2.0%Pessimism Bias3.4%This article: 12.8%Ashley Oliver: 22.4%FoxBusiness: 7.8%Negativity Bias12.8%This article: 7.5%Ashley Oliver: 1.2%FoxBusiness: 4.5%Self-Serving Bias7.5%This article: 0.0%Ashley Oliver: 2.5%FoxBusiness: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley Oliver: 0.2%FoxBusiness: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 4.1%Ashley Oliver: 6.7%FoxBusiness: 1.7%In-Group Bias4.1%This article: 0.0%Ashley Oliver: 4.3%FoxBusiness: 0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 4.1%Ashley Oliver: 2.9%FoxBusiness: 3.9%Halo Effect4.1%This article: 0.0%Ashley Oliver: 1.7%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley Oliver: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley Oliver: 2.1%FoxBusiness: 2.3%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley Oliver: 0.4%FoxBusiness: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley Oliver: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 4.9%Ashley Oliver: 5.5%FoxBusiness: 0.8%Ad Hominem4.9%This article: 3.7%Ashley Oliver: 1.9%FoxBusiness: 0.4%Straw Man3.7%This article: 1.7%Ashley Oliver: 6.5%FoxBusiness: 7.2%Appeal to Authority1.7%This article: 5.7%Ashley Oliver: 0.6%FoxBusiness: 1.6%False Dilemma5.7%This article: 0.0%Ashley Oliver: 0.8%FoxBusiness: 1.2%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley Oliver: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley Oliver: 7.9%FoxBusiness: 6.3%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley Oliver: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.8%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley Oliver: 0.9%FoxBusiness: 1.2%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 4.6%Ashley Oliver: 11.2%FoxBusiness: 6.1%Appeal to Emotion4.6%This article: 5.4%Ashley Oliver: 1.7%FoxBusiness: 1.2%Begging the Question5.4%This article: 14.4%Ashley Oliver: 3.3%FoxBusiness: 4.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)14.4%This article: 0.0%Ashley Oliver: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley Oliver: 0.1%FoxBusiness: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley Oliver: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley Oliver: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley Oliver: 2.0%FoxBusiness: 2.4%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley Oliver: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley Oliver: 0.7%FoxBusiness: 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley Oliver: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley Oliver: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley Oliver: 0.2%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley Oliver: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.3%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley Oliver: 1.6%FoxBusiness: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley Oliver: 1.6%FoxBusiness: 1.8%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 4.2%Ashley Oliver: 2.2%FoxBusiness: 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection4.2%This article: 0.0%Ashley Oliver: 12.0%FoxBusiness: 4.1%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 2.9%Ashley Oliver: 0.8%FoxBusiness: 1.7%Indoctrination2.9%This article: 0.0%Ashley Oliver: 0.5%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley Oliver: 13.4%FoxBusiness: 2.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 1.0%Ashley Oliver: 1.0%FoxBusiness: 4.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…1.0%

831 words analyzed.

Speakers

5speakers47%attributed speech442writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageJeanine Pirro • 47 words • 0.0% coverageJeanine Pirro • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageJeanine Pirro • 35 words • 100.0% coverageJeanine Pirro • 14 words • 0.0% coverageJeanine Pirro • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageJeanine Pirro • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 39 words • 0.0% coverageKaroline Leavitt • 45 words • 0.0% coverageKaroline Leavitt • 15 words • 0.0% coverageKaroline Leavitt • 24 words • 100.0% coverageKaroline Leavitt • 5 words • 0.0% coverageKaroline Leavitt • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 42 words • 0.0% coverageThom Tillis • 27 words • 0.0% coverageThom Tillis • 12 words • 0.0% coverageThom Tillis • 42 words • 0.0% coverageFox News Digital • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 45 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Donald Trump

100%flagged-word coverage
14 attributed words3.6% of attributed speech70% writer coverage
0%2.5%5.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -1.8 ptsWriter: 1.8%Donald Trump: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.