Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video831 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Michael Horowitz results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias, Negativity Bias, and Halo Effect, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12.9% saturation with 430 hits. Analysis detected 2,707 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,324 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 51% (18,430 of 37,533 keywords). This Michael Horowitz is worse (more manipulative) than 50.90% of the peer group.
Michael Horowitz
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
51%Michael Horowitz (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,324
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

51% percentile
025507510050.9% percentile
2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 12.9%12.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 7.6%7.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.0%5.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 8.7%8.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.8%1.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.9%3.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 12.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 1.4%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 4.6%Ad Hominem: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 3.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos