Topic summary
34% 14 analyzed articles/videos 5,120 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Environmental Law results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.1% saturation with 4,466 hits . Analysis detected 37,783 faulty-reasoning hits from 40,386 analyzed words across 14 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 16% (13,987 of 16,559 topics). This Environmental Law is better (less manipulative) than 84.50% of the peer group. Environmental Law
Topic details
Total words: 40,386
Article count: 14
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
16% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 15.5% percentile 1.8% BS Score14 analyzed articles40.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 8.6% 8.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 7.5% 7.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 11.1% 11.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.9% 3.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.4% 3.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.8% 3.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.4% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst