Author summary
56% 5 analyzed articles/videos 5,444 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kate Yoder results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10% saturation with 2,938 hits . Analysis detected 26,506 faulty-reasoning hits from 29,246 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 31% (4,573 of 6,628 authors). This Kate Yoder is better (less manipulative) than 69.00% of the peer group. Kate Yoder
Author details
Total words: 29,246
Article count: 5
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
31% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 31.0% percentile 2.0% BS Score5 analyzed articles29.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 10.1% 10.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.5% 7.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.1% 5.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.9% 2.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.7% 4.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.7% 2.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.0% 1.0% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 10.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.5%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 3.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 2.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.8%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst