Author summary
56%5 analyzed articles/videos5,444 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kate Yoder results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10% saturation with 2,938 hits. Analysis detected 26,506 faulty-reasoning hits from 29,246 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 31% (4,573 of 6,628 authors). This Kate Yoder is better (less manipulative) than 69.00% of the peer group.
Kate Yoder
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
31%Kate Yoder (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 29,246
Article count: 5
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

31% percentile
025507510031.0% percentile
2.0% BS Score5 analyzed articles29.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 10.1%10.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 7.5%7.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 5.1%5.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.0%3.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.9%0.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.9%2.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 4.7%4.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 2.7%2.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 1.0%1.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 10.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 7.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 4.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 6.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.5%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 3.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.8%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate