Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,510 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Zoya Teirstein results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) , Availability Heuristic , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.8% saturation with 2,362 hits . Analysis detected 11,700 faulty-reasoning hits from 18,516 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 22% (5,006 of 6,379 authors). This Zoya Teirstein is better (less manipulative) than 78.50% of the peer group. Zoya Teirstein
Author details
Total words: 18,516
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
22% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 21.5% percentile 1.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles18.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.3% 4.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.1% 3.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.1% 0.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.9% 0.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 12.8% 12.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.7% 0.7% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 8.9% 8.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.5% 4.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 12.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.5%, sitewide 9.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 8.9%, sitewide 3.3% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Recency Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst