Topic summary
80% 11 analyzed articles/videos 2,957 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Economic Indicators results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Optimism Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13.1% saturation with 2,204 hits . Analysis detected 17,842 faulty-reasoning hits from 16,857 analyzed words across 11 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 40% (9,832 of 16,245 topics). This Economic Indicators is better (less manipulative) than 60.50% of the peer group. Economic Indicators
Topic details
Total words: 16,857
Article count: 11
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
40% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 39.5% percentile 2.5% BS Score11 analyzed articles16.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 13.1% 13.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.1% 0.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 12.5% 12.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.7% 3.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Topic 7.4% 7.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 7.0% 7.0% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Topic 5.6% 5.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 13.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 12.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 8.1% Optimism Bias: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 6.0% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 7.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 7.4%, sitewide 3.3% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Pessimism Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 1.9% Anecdotal: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 4.6% Recency Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 2.7% Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst