Author summary
45% 1 analyzed article/video 797 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Katica Roy results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 23.1% saturation with 737 hits . Analysis detected 3,570 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,188 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.7% and a BS Rank of 81% (1,209 of 6,244 authors). This Katica Roy is worse (more manipulative) than 80.70% of the peer group. Katica Roy
Author details
Total words: 3,188
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
81% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 80.7% percentile 4.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 23.1% 23.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.8% 2.8% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 15.9% 15.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.8% 0.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 12.0% 12.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.5% 0.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.5% 0.5% Representativeness Heuris… Sitewide 1.9% Author 7.4% 7.4% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 5.1% 5.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.7% 6.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 15.9%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 23.1%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 12.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.7%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 9.5%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 7.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 7.4%, sitewide 1.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.3%, sitewide 3.3% Indoctrination: Author 5.1%, sitewide 0.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.8%, sitewide 0.8% Loss Aversion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.5% Begging the Question: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% Composition/Division: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.2% Burden of Proof: Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.4% Straw Man: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.9% Primacy Effect: Author 0.1%, sitewide 0.9% Special Pleading: Author 0.2%, sitewide 0.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst