Topic summary
â 36% 7 analyzed articles/videos 5,515 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Depression results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Hasty Generalization , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8% saturation with 2,849 hits . Analysis detected 28,757 faulty-reasoning hits from 35,802 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of â 10% (14,053 of 15,534 topics). This Depression is better (less manipulative) than 90.50% of the peer group. Depression
Topic details
Total words: 35,802
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
10% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 9.5% percentile 1.6% BS Score7 analyzed articles35.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 4.2% 4.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.8% 3.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 8.0% 8.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.2% 5.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.0% Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst