Author summary
62% 1 analyzed article/video 550 analyzed words
BS Summary: These The Bronfenbrenner Center for Translational Research results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Indoctrination , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 15.9% saturation with 263 hits . Analysis detected 1,457 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,650 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of 77% (1,537 of 6,628 authors). This The Bronfenbrenner Center for Translational Research is worse (more manipulative) than 76.80% of the peer group. The Bronfenbrenner Center for Translational Research
Author details
Total words: 1,650
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
77% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 76.8% percentile 4.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.9% 5.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.1% 4.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.4% 1.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 15.9% 15.9% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 7.5% 7.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.2% 2.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 11.5% 11.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.9% 1.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.6% 0.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 4.1% 4.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Author 15.9%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.4%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Author 11.5%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Authority: Author 8.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 7.5% Indoctrination: Author 7.5%, sitewide 0.0% Halo Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 4.6% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.5%, sitewide 5.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.1%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Recency Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.1% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.5% Begging the Question: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.7% Burden of Proof: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst